이전 다음

차라리 작품내 설정으로 새로운 합금이나 금속이 섞여서 무거워진다면 10kg 검도 가능하겠지요. 혹은 등장인물들의 신체가 엄청 강화되서 쇠몽둥이만큼 두꺼운 검을 좋아한다면요. 그 외에는 전부 자료조사를 제대로 안한거지요

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

ㅋㅋㅋㅇㅈ 그냥 포환 생각하면됨 포환을 밀어던져야지, 휘둘러버리면 팔 망가져 버림

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

무예도보통지에 언월도 무게가 3근 14냥이라고 하는 대목이 있다고 함.
삼국지에 나오는 82근 청룡언월도는 소설적 개뻥이라고 봐야함.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

3근 14냥이면kg 으로 1.9kg 정도 되나요? 예전에는 근 단위가 달랐었던가.....

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

[增]자루의 길이(柄長)는 6자(尺) 4치(寸)이고, 칼날의 길이는(刃長) 2자 8치이며, 총 무게(共重)는 3근(斤) 14냥(兩)이다. 기인(歧刃)에 이(毦)【음은 이(二)이고, 깃과 털로 만든 장식이다.
[네이버 지식백과] 월도 (문화콘텐츠닷컴 (문화원형백과 한국무예 및 무과시험), 2003., 한국콘텐츠진흥원)

위키에는 2.5kg정도라고 하는데,
단위변환기로하면 1.9kg밖에안나오는데
영조척쓰던시대라 무게도량형도 지금이랑 단위가 좀 다른가 봄

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

투핸디드소드가 왜 폴암계열인가요?
폴암은 장대무기이고 폴암을 구분짓는 문제는 무기 전체의 길이가 아니라 자루의 길이문제인데요.

Great-Swords
The various kinds of long bladed Medieval swords that had handles long enough to be used in two hands were deemed long-swords (German Langenschwert/ Langes Swert or Italian spada longa). Long-swords, war-swords, or great swords are characterized by having both a long grip and a long blade. We know at the time that Medieval warriors did distinguished war-swords or great-swords ("grant espees" or "grete swerdes") from "standard" swords in general, but long-swords were really just those larger versions of typical one-handed swords, except with stouter blades. They were "longer swords," as opposed to single-hand swords, or just "swords." They could be used on foot or mounted and sometimes even with a shield.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

Two-handed Swords
The term "two-hander" or "two-handed sword" (espée a deure mains or spada da due mani) was in use as early as 1400 and is really a classification of sword applied both to Medieval great-swords as well Renaissance swords (the true two-handed swords). Such weapons saw more use in the later Middle Ages and early Renaissance. Technically, true two-handed swords (epee's a deux main) were actually Renaissance, not Medieval weapons. They are really those specialized forms of the later 1500-1600's, such as the Swiss/German Dopplehander ("double-hander") or Bidenhander ("both-hander") or Zweihander / Zweyhander are relatively modern not historical terms. English ones were sometimes referred to as "slaughterswords" after the German Schlachterschwerter ("battle swords"). These weapons were used primarily for fighting against pike-squares where they would hack paths through lobbing the tips off the poles. In Germany, England, and elsewhere schools also taught their use for single-combat. In True two-handed swords have compound-hilts with side-rings and enlarged cross-guards of up to 12 inches. Most have small, pointed lugs or flanges protruding from their blades 4-8 inches below their guard. These parrierhaken or "parrying hooks" act almost as a secondary guard for the ricasso to prevent other weapons from sliding down into the hands. They make up for the weapon's slowness on the defence and can allow another blade to be momentarily trapped or bound up. They can also be used to strike with. The most well-known of "twa handit swordis" is the Scottish Claymore (Gaelic for "claidheamh-more" or great-sword) which developed out of earlier Scottish great-swords with which they are often compared. They were used by the Scottish Highlanders against the English in the 1500's. Another sword of the same name is the later Scots basket-hilt broadsword (a relative of the Renaissance Slavic-Italian schiavona) whose hilt completely enclosed the hand in a cage-like guard. Both swords have come to be known by the same name since the late 1700's. Certain wave or flame-bladed two-handed swords have come to be known by collectors as flamberges, although this is inaccurate. Such swords developed in the early-to-mid 1500's and are more appropriately known as flammards or flambards (the German Flammenschwert). The flamberge was also a term later applied to certain types of rapiers. The wave-blade form is visually striking but really no more effective in its cutting than a straight one. There were also huge two-handed blades known as "bearing-swords" or "parade-swords" (Paratschwert), weighing up to 12 or even 15 pounds and which were intended only for carrying in ceremonial processions and parades. In the 1500’s there were also a few rare single-edged two-handers such as the Swiss-German Grosse Messer or later sometimes called a Zwiehand sabel.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

조금 다른 이야기인데, ARMA Korea 분께서 트루 투헨더 같은 검은 일상이 아니라 전쟁에만 쓰였고 실제 전장에서의 역할도 폴암에 가까웠다고 하긴 하더군요.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

들녘에서 나온 그책을 말한다면 그건 안읽는게 차라리 나은 책임.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

네. 맞아요. 그 책 오류가 너무 많아서 오히려 독이 됩니다.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

그렇죠. 검에 무거운 금속이 첨가되었다던가 , 아니면 신체강화인간들이 쓰는 검이 따로 있다는 식으로 설정이 있어야 합니다. 그런데 문제는 일반 강철로 된 10kg 짜리 검이 2kg짜리 검의 형태와 크기가 같다는 겁니다. 아는게 병이라고 , 별것 아닐수 있지만요....

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

관련 설정이 따로 없다면, 아무리 딴 세계라고 해도 기본 이해는 우리사는 세계의 상식에서 출발하는것이니... 그냥 초보 작가의 실수인것 같네요.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

그래서 초보자들에게 안좋은책이라는거임
초보자들은 기초지식이 부족해 참과 거짓을 판별해서 선택취사 할 능력이 없기 때문에 오류가 많은 책을 읽으면 지금에서야 완전히 논파되어 쓰레기통에 쳐박힌 풀플레이트 거북이설, 서양검 쇠몽둥이설, 양손검 10kg설, 서양무술부재설같은 말같지도 않은 소리를 신봉하게 될 가능성이 높은겁니다.

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0

풀플레이트 거북이설은 저도 한동안 믿었던 적이 있었죠.... 유투브에서 실증 동영상을 보기 전까지는요. 유투브야 말로 21세기 보물인듯

찬성: 0 | 반대: 0